Kalama Sutta
“With the Kālāmas of Kesamutta”
The Kālāmas were confused by teachers who each praised their own doctrine and attacked others. The Buddha tells them not to accept a teaching merely on tradition, scripture, logic or a teacher’s authority, but to give up what they know for themselves is unskillful and leads to harm and suffering, and to take up what is skillful and leads to welfare and happiness.
The ten things not to go by
In Sujato’s translation the list reads:
- oral transmission
- lineage
- testament
- canonical authority
- logic
- inference
- reasoned train of thought
- the acceptance of a view after deliberation
- the appearance of competence
- the thought “The ascetic is our respected teacher.”
The test that replaces them
The discourse does not stop at doubt. The test is specific: are these things skillful or unskillful, blameworthy or blameless, criticized or praised by sensible people, and when undertaken, do they lead to harm and suffering or to welfare and happiness?
The Buddha then walks the Kālāmas through it. Greed, hate and delusion lead a person to kill, steal, commit adultery and lie, “for their lasting harm and suffering.” Contentment, love and understanding lead the other way. The Kālāmas answer each question themselves.
The discourse ends with the four boundless states (love, compassion, rejoicing and equanimity) and four “consolations”: whether or not there is another world and results of deeds, a person with a mind free of enmity has lost nothing.
This widely shared version is a loose paraphrase. It drops the sutta’s actual test (harm or welfare, and what sensible people criticize or praise) and adds “reason” as the final judge, although “logic” and “inference” are on the Buddha’s list of things not to go by alone.
About this text
While wandering through Kosala with a large group of mendicants, the Buddha arrives at Kesamutta, a town of the Kālāmas. They tell him that visiting teachers each promote their own doctrine and disparage the others, leaving them doubtful. The Buddha says their doubt is reasonable. He asks them not to rely on tradition, scripture, logic, or a teacher’s reputation, but to know for themselves whether things lead to harm or to welfare, and then to give up the one and keep the other. Through questions about greed, hate, and delusion he draws this out, then describes a heart of love, compassion, rejoicing, and equanimity, and four consolations it brings.
A note on this text. Long and built from repeated question-and-answer lists. The four consolations weigh what follows if there is, or is not, another world after death.
The full text
Numbered Discourses 3.65 · 7. The Great Chapter · With the Kālāmas of Kesamutta · translated by Bhikkhu Sujato · public domain (CC0) · about 8 min · on SuttaCentral
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was wandering in the land of the Kosalans together with a large Saṅgha of mendicants when he arrived at a town of the Kālāmas named Kesamutta. The Kālāmas of Kesamutta heard: “It seems the ascetic Gotama—a Sakyan, gone forth from a Sakyan family—has arrived at Kesamutta. He has this good reputation: ‘That Blessed One is perfected, a fully awakened Buddha …’ It’s good to see such perfected ones.”
Then the Kālāmas went up to the Buddha. Before sitting down to one side, some bowed, some exchanged greetings and polite conversation, some held up their cupped palms toward the Buddha, some announced their name and clan, while some kept silent. Seated to one side the Kālāmas said to the Buddha:
“There are, sir, some ascetics and brahmins who come to Kesamutta. They explain and promote only their own doctrine, while they attack, badmouth, disparage, and smear the doctrines of others. Then some other ascetics and brahmins come to Kesamutta. They too explain and promote only their own doctrine, while they attack, badmouth, disparage, and smear the doctrines of others. So, sir, we’re doubting and uncertain: ‘I wonder who of these respected ascetics and brahmins speaks the truth, and who speaks falsehood?’” “It is enough, Kālāmas, for you to be doubting and uncertain. Doubt has come up in you about an uncertain matter.
Please, Kālāmas, don’t go by oral transmission, don’t go by lineage, don’t go by testament, don’t go by canonical authority, don’t rely on logic, don’t rely on inference, don’t go by reasoned train of thought, don’t go by the acceptance of a view after deliberation, don’t go by the appearance of competence, and don’t think ‘The ascetic is our respected teacher.’ But when you know for yourselves: ‘These things are unskillful, blameworthy, criticized by sensible people, and when you undertake them, they lead to harm and suffering’, then you should give them up.
Explained: Know it for yourself
What do you think, Kālāmas? Does greed come up in a person for their welfare or harm?”
“Harm, sir.”
“A greedy individual, overcome by greed, kills living creatures, steals, commits adultery, lies, and encourages others to do the same. Is that for their lasting harm and suffering?”
“Yes, sir.”
“What do you think, Kālāmas? Does hate come up in a person for their welfare or harm?”
“Harm, sir.”
“A hateful individual, overcome by hate, kills living creatures, steals, commits adultery, lies, and encourages others to do the same. Is that for their lasting harm and suffering?”
“Yes, sir.”
“What do you think, Kālāmas? Does delusion come up in a person for their welfare or harm?”
“Harm, sir.”
“A deluded individual, overcome by delusion, kills living creatures, steals, commits adultery, lies, and encourages others to do the same. Is that for their lasting harm and suffering?”
“Yes, sir.”
“What do you think, Kālāmas, are these things skillful or unskillful?”
“Unskillful, sir.”
“Blameworthy or blameless?”
“Blameworthy, sir.”
“Criticized or praised by sensible people?”
“Criticized by sensible people, sir.”
“When you undertake them, do they lead to harm and suffering, or not? Or how do you see this?”
“When you undertake them, they lead to harm and suffering. That’s how we see it.”
“So, Kālāmas, when I said: ‘Please, don’t go by oral transmission, don’t go by lineage, don’t go by testament, don’t go by canonical authority, don’t rely on logic, don’t rely on inference, don’t go by reasoned train of thought, don’t go by the acceptance of a view after deliberation, don’t go by the appearance of competence, and don’t think “The ascetic is our respected teacher.” But when you know for yourselves: “These things are unskillful, blameworthy, criticized by sensible people, and when you undertake them, they lead to harm and suffering”, then you should give them up.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.
Please, Kālāmas, don’t go by oral transmission, don’t go by lineage, don’t go by testament, don’t go by canonical authority, don’t rely on logic, don’t rely on inference, don’t go by reasoned train of thought, don’t go by the acceptance of a view after deliberation, don’t go by the appearance of competence, and don’t think ‘The ascetic is our respected teacher.’ But when you know for yourselves: ‘These things are skillful, blameless, praised by sensible people, and when you undertake them, they lead to welfare and happiness’, then you should acquire them and keep them.
What do you think, Kālāmas? Does contentment come up in a person for their welfare or harm?”
“Welfare, sir.”
“An individual who is content, not overcome by greed, doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, commit adultery, lie, or encourage others to do the same. Is that for their lasting welfare and happiness?”
“Yes, sir.”
“What do you think, Kālāmas? Does love come up in a person for their welfare or harm? … Does understanding come up in a person for their welfare or harm? … Is that for their lasting welfare and happiness?”
“Yes, sir.”
“What do you think, Kālāmas, are these things skillful or unskillful?”
“Skillful, sir.”
“Blameworthy or blameless?”
“Blameless, sir.”
“Criticized or praised by sensible people?”
“Praised by sensible people, sir.”
“When you undertake them, do they lead to welfare and happiness, or not? Or how do you see this?”
“When you undertake them, they lead to welfare and happiness. That’s how we see it.”
“So, Kālāmas, when I said: ‘Please, don’t go by oral transmission, don’t go by lineage, don’t go by testament, don’t go by canonical authority, don’t rely on logic, don’t rely on inference, don’t go by reasoned train of thought, don’t go by the acceptance of a view after deliberation, don’t go by the appearance of competence, and don’t think “The ascetic is our respected teacher.” But when you know for yourselves: “These things are skillful, blameless, praised by sensible people, and when you undertake them, they lead to welfare and happiness”, then you should acquire them and keep them.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.
Then that noble disciple is rid of desire, rid of ill will, unconfused, aware, and mindful. They meditate spreading a heart full of love to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of love to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. They meditate spreading a heart full of compassion to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of compassion to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. They meditate spreading a heart full of rejoicing to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of rejoicing to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. They meditate spreading a heart full of equanimity to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of equanimity to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will.
When that noble disciple has a mind that’s free of enmity and ill will, uncorrupted and purified, they’ve won four consolations in this very life. ‘If it turns out there is another world, and good and bad deeds have a result, then—when the body breaks up, after death—I’ll be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.’ This is the first consolation they’ve won.
‘If it turns out there is no other world, and good and bad deeds don’t have a result, then in this very life I’ll keep myself free of enmity and ill will, untroubled and happy.’ This is the second consolation they’ve won.
‘If it turns out that bad things happen to people who do bad things, then since I have no bad intentions, and since I’m not doing anything bad, how can suffering touch me?’ This is the third consolation they’ve won.
‘If it turns out that bad things don’t happen to people who do bad things, then I still see myself pure on both sides.’ This is the fourth consolation they’ve won.
When that noble disciple has a mind that’s free of enmity and ill will, uncorrupted and purified, they’ve won these four consolations in this very life.”
“That’s so true, Blessed One! That’s so true, Holy One! When that noble disciple has a mind that’s free of enmity and ill will, uncorrupted and purified, they’ve won these four consolations in this very life. …
Excellent, sir! Excellent! … We go for refuge to the Buddha, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the Buddha remember us as lay followers who have gone for refuge for life.”
Questions
Does the Kalama Sutta say to believe only what you can reason out?
No. Logic and inference are on the list of things not to rely on by themselves. The sutta asks whether a thing is unskillful, blameworthy, criticized by sensible people, and leads to harm, as known for oneself.
Is it called the Kalama Sutta or the Kesamutti Sutta?
Both names are used. The Kālāmas lived in a town called Kesamutta; Sujato titles the discourse “With the Kālāmas of Kesamutta”. It is AN 3.65 in the Numbered Discourses.